It’s always stunning to me to see how big a percentage of “Liberal, left-ist” students at Universities in the Bay Area consider themselves open to new ideas and philosophies, but are, in reality, grounded in theoretical cement up to their knees.
I only use this example because it is what I know best from first hand experiences. While it may only be a prevailing stereotype, and not a fact, the image of a southern-state, loudly opinionated white male citizen of the States may be the person that jumps to mind when you think of someone who is resistant to change. It is simply not the case. Resistance to change is everywhere.
People are raised into belief systems all over the country, and the world, that are not questioned by anyone in their immediate circles until they come into contact with an educational institution, and the other viewpoints it brings with it. This can be a fascinating process to witness, as well as take part in. People show up with their cups full, and its very hard to pour tea into a full cup, as the old proverb suggests.
Those who see opinions and ideas expressed clearly and in a manner that is respectful, yet still extremely persuasive, have the rare opportunity to see the “other”side of an argument, and in even rarer cases, change their entire opinion or belief about the subject.
Then there are the majority of people in society who staunchly stand behind, in front of, and indeed IN their beliefs, but without sufficient argument to defend them. Their kneecaps flaking off bits of dried concrete, barely leaving them any room to wiggle.
But what I am driving at here is not so much intended to persuade you to more often change your beliefs to the other point of view, but to closely examine where your beliefs come from, and to monitor constantly why you choose to accept and reject different ideas and theories.
When you approach an idea or discussion, do you come in with your cup empty or full? Are you even willing to take in and process what the other side is saying, or are you simply thinking of what you will say next, to defend your side?
Why do you think certain things are “bad” or “good?” Is there legitimate footing for you to be standing on with that argument on your shoulders?
Of course this concept can be applied to the issues and ideas which dominate national discussions, like abortion, gay rights, religious rights, drugs and their uses, and financial decisions. But this concept can absolutely apply to the way we relate to other people. Where have your predetermined judgements come from? Race, sexual orientation, hairstyle, clothing choices, and financial status seem to be some of the first things people use to eliminate “others” from their circle of influence.
“Clearly, I cant learn anything from him, he’s not as smart as me. He doesn’t make as much money as me. I am better than him.”
Sure, maybe the sentence doesn’t sound that clear cut in your head, but the fact is, people will use any amount of unfounded reasons to classify someone else or a group of people as “The Other.” It is through this type of thinking that mankind has shown its greatest failure; the inability to see each other as equals, despite the overwhelming evidence that we are all one in the same.
Just a thought for the day, the week, the month and the year.